What will happen to gay marriage now

So far inat least nine states have either introduced legislation aimed at blocking new marriage licenses for LGBTQ people or passed resolutions urging the Supreme Court to reverse Obergefell at the earliest opportunity, according to the advocacy group Lambda Legal.

If Obergefell were overturned, it could become illegal for gay couples to marry in the 32 states that still have bans on the books. Davis, as the Rowan County Clerk inwas the sole authority tasked with issuing marriage licenses on behalf of the government under state law.

Still, it's wise for LGBTQ+ couples to get their house in order. Wade in and allowed states to outlaw abortion. He calls Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion in Obergefell "legal fiction. More fundamentally, she claims the high court's decision in Obergefell v Hodges -- extending marriage rights for same-sex couples under the 14th Amendment's due process protections -- was "egregiously wrong.

Democrats and LGBTQ advocates have been fearful of what will happen to protections for same-sex marriage since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. If the ruling were to be overturned at some point in the future, it would not invalidate marriages already performed, legal experts have pointed out.

Wade. Hodges were ever overturned in a similar manner to Roe vs. If the case is accepted, it would likely be scheduled for oral argument next spring and decided by the end of June The court could also decline the case, allowing a lower court ruling to stand and avoid entirely the request to revisit Obergefell.

Davis' appeal to the Supreme Court comes as conservative opponents of marriage rights for same-sex couples pursue a renewed campaign to reverse legal precedent and allow each state to set its own policy. Supreme Court isn't poised to end gay marriage, despite the media's fearmongering | Opinion This case is not likely to be heard by the U.S.

Supreme Court, nor is it anywhere close to ending the. At the time Obergefell was decided in35 states had statutory or constitutional bans on same-sex marriages, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Lower courts have dismissed Davis' claims and most legal experts consider her bid a long shot.

Ten years after the Supreme Court extended marriage rights to same-sex couples nationwide, the justices this fall will consider for the first time whether to take up a case that explicitly asks them to overturn that decision. Several states would see a reversal on same-sex marriage if Obergefell vs.

Davis is seen as one of the only Americans currently with legal standing to bring a challenge to the precedent. In a petition for writ of certiorari filed last month, Davis argues First Amendment protection for free exercise of religion immunizes her from personal liability for the denial of marriage licenses.

A federal appeals court panel concluded earlier this year that the former clerk "cannot raise the First Amendment as a defense because she is being held liable for state action, which the First Amendment does not protect. The petition appears to mark the first time since that the court has been formally asked to overturn the landmark marriage decision.

Only eight states had enacted laws explicitly allowing the unions.

Will Supreme Court Overturn

Davis' petition argues the issue of marriage should be treated the same way the court handled the issue of abortion in its decision to overturn Roe v Wade. The justices "should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell," Thomas wrote at the time, referring to the landmark decisions dealing with a fundamental right to privacy, due process and equal protection rights.

In June, the Southern Baptist Convention -- the nation's largest Protestant Christian denomination -- overwhelmingly voted to make "overturning of laws and court rulings, including Obergefell v. Hodges, that defy God's design for marriage and family" a top priority.

The court is expected to formally consider Davis' petition this fall during a private conference when the justices discuss which cases to add to their docket. Court of Appeals showed any interest in Davis's rehearing petition, and we are confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that Davis's arguments do not merit further attention," said William Powell, attorney for David Ermold and David Moore, the now-married Kentucky couple that sued Davis for damages, in a statement to ABC News.

Blackman predicts many members of the Supreme Court's conservative majority would want prospective challenges to Obergefell to percolate in lower courts before revisiting the debate.

Why is gay marriage

As the Supreme Court mulls over whether or not to take a case asking them to overturn the historic ruling, we’ve documented every step that has been taken in the past five years to threaten gay marriage in the U.S. The recent challenge to marriage equality is still in its nascent stages, experts say.

She zeroes in on Justice Clarence Thomas' concurrence in that case, in which he explicitly called for revisiting Obergefell. Kim Davis, a former clerk who refused gay couples, brought the appeal.